Reading tea leaves: Why the Court will uphold Proposition 8
This blog is pleased to have reactions to the oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor from guest contributors with a range of perspectives. This post has reactions from...
View ArticleMore tea leaves: Why DOMA’s demise will support Prop 8 surprise
This blog is pleased to have reactions to the oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor from guest contributors with a range of perspectives. This post has reactions from...
View ArticleSymposium: Hobby Lobby and Conestoga: The most difficult-to-answer question
The following contribution to our contraceptive mandate symposium comes from John Bursch, a partner at Warner, Norcross and Judd. From February 2011 to December 2013 Mr. Bursch served as Michigan’s...
View ArticleSymposium: Contraceptive mandate cases – why the Supreme Court will instruct...
John Bursch co-chairs the Appellate & Supreme Court Practice at Warner Norcross & Judd LLP. John has argued nine U.S. Supreme Court cases since 2011 and was recently inducted as a Fellow of the...
View ArticleSymposium: If Justice Kennedy thought Colorado was “neither tolerant nor...
John J. Bursch is the founder of Bursch Law PLLC, a Michigan-based appellate boutique. He submitted an amicus brief in support of the crisis pregnancy centers’ cert petition in National Institute of...
View Article